Malefic Traditional

Our continuing ties to ancient curses (Defixiones, Part 2)

In the Graeco-Roman world, if you had a problem, you might visit a shrine and use an iron stylus to write a note on a lead slip to a deity you thought might be sympathetic and effective for the type of help you needed. If you knew the name of the person responsible for your woes, you could put the finger on them and ask a variety of awful punishments be meted out. This might at first seem strange and foreign to you, but looking into it further, it actually connects to some quite familiar things.

First, I’d like to point out some linguistic connections: we still say spellbinding, breaking a spell. The root of the Latin word for a curse tablet, defixio, is fīgō, cognate with our word fix, in the sense of fasten, and likewise the nucleus of the Greek term for these objects, κατάδεσμος is δέω; “to tie”. The very word magic comes down to us from Old Iranian via Greek µάγος (magos), and Pliny’s transliteration of the adjectival noun µαγική (magike) seems to have been the original coinage, eventually pushing out Germanic words like dyr and galdr.¹ Other European languages from Russia to Portugal also contain terms closely related to magia, demonstrating the pervasive influence of this Graeco-Roman tradition across the region.

For physical evidence, I’ll turn to the research of Marina Piranomonte.² Together with other academicians, she has worked painstakingly on the finds relating to the fountain of Anna Perenna and her Nymphs.

This site is important for several reasons: First, it is a fairly recent discovery, having only been found in 1999 during work on an underground carpark at Piazza Euclide in the area of Parioli in northern Rome. Our techniques of archeological excavation are vastly superior to those the Victorians applied at Aquae Sulis (modern Bath), for example, including careful documentation and preservation of the artifacts together with their context.

Next, rather than dealing with the finds of an entire town, the fountain is a relatively discrete location well outside of ancient Rome proper, across the large open area of the former Campus Martius. The shrine was closed up when Rome turned away from paganism, likely under Theodosius I, who made Nicene Christianity the state religion of Rome in 380, additionally forbidding the worship of the old gods, and the site was left unmolested until it was stumbled upon during the building of the carpark.

Finally, after its abandonment, the cistern was filled with clay deposits, which rendered the environment nearly anaerobic and thus preserved the contents to a remarkable degree.

Some discussion of the deities enshrined at this location is necessary here. Anna Perenna is a little-known deity, who, though Ovid names her as Dido’s sister³—the Queen of Carthage of Aeneid fame—seems to have originated as a mother goddess of the Etruscans. Under the Romans, she became identified with the yearly cycle—the assignment of this role seems simply due to a linguistic coincidence with the Latin phrase, per annum. Her rites took place on the Ides of March and were described as Bacchic. Only three cultic shrines are known, this one, one in Sicily, and one in Cisalpine Gaul.

When I say nymphs, which Anna Perenna is also sometimes described as—as a mortal, she was drowned in a river, a typical nymph origin story—that’s likely to conjure images of beautiful young women. However, these nature spirits were really more closely aligned with Dionysus, the sileni, and Pan—deities of the untamed landscape. Nymphs, in particular, represented the seductive and dangerous qualities of such wild places. England’s Peg Powler, who lures victims to the water’s edge, then drags them under, occupies this same type of mythic space, with similar traditions appearing around the world. This, coupled with the fact these bodies of water were thought of as passages to the netherworld as I mentioned in the previous Part that, makes this fountain an obvious place from which to send malign messages.

Now to the artifacts. Piranomonte describes these as:

[…] 549 coins, 74 oil-lamps, 22 randomly-scattered curse-tablets, 18 cylindrical containers made of lead-sheet, some containing poppets, […] a large copper-alloy pot or bucket (caccabus) with traces of use on a fire, seven pine cones, egg-shells, twigs and a number of small plaques made of different kinds of wood.

Since the shrine was both a religious site and a source of freshwater (it was located at a natural spring), all these items have to be considered as votives specifically and deliberately brought into the place and deposited in the cistern.

Let’s begin with the pinecones. The pinecone remains a symbol of fertility, health, and good luck across Europe, with folk beliefs stating women wishing to become pregnant should place them beneath their pillows. It also features prominently in Near Eastern religions, in particular the apkallu (𒉣𒈨) figures tending trees in Mesopotamian reliefs and the snake-staff of Osiris. A pinecone-tipped staff called a thyrsus was also the emblem of Dionysus and his followers; satyrs and maenads, all of which I’ve already explained relate closely to nymphs. The pine’s seemingly magical ability to remain green through the winter is the source of these beliefs, and also why the tree and its cones remain a symbol of our Christmas. I’d suppose the other pieces of wood also relate to this type of idea.

And speaking of Christian symbols borrowed from pagan beliefs: eggs. Yep, eggs are another emblem of fertility used nearly worldwide. And of course, these continue to be a part of our tradition as “Easter” eggs.

The cooking pot is complete with an arc-shaped hanger from which to suspend it over a flame. It’s a pretty classic witch’s cauldron, though a small one, so add Halloween to the modern holidays we’ve found correspondences for.

Now for some trickier material: the containers. These seem to have been used in some form of malign magic, and their exteriors were inscribed in similar fashion to defixiones and made of the same material. They were generally a set of three containers of graduating size, each nested within the next in the fashion of matryoshki, and were hermetically sealed.

The number three, besides connecting to images of Graeco-Roman myth, particularly those of the underworld, especially with the three-headed figures of Cerberus and Trivia (Ἑκάτη, Hekate), but also to folk belief right down to today. You are likely to have said some version of “the third time’s a charm” without considering the tradition of magic behind the utterance. For those who would point to Christianity’s Holy Trinity as the origin for the phrase, I say perhaps, but the Holy Spirit was more or less an invention of the First Council of Constantinople in 381, and there was a variety of pagan trinities to draw the idea from well predating it. Hermes (Ἑρμῆς), another god of magic, is known as Τρικεφαλος (3-headed) in his role as the protector of intersecting roads, another related magical tradition.

Next, some containers held poppets made of wax and other organic materials, such as flour, sugar, herbs, and milk. All the figures were formed around slivers of animal bone, some of which had fallen out, revealing they also bore inscriptions. Some of these poppets were partially wrapped in lead sheet and/ or pierced with nails.

If this sounds like the stereotypical “voodoo doll”, it is. However, such effigies actually have no place in the vodun of West Africa, nor in their forms practiced on this side of the Atlantic. Rather, it is a tradition of Western witchcraft with its origins in Graeco-Roman ritual and ultimately from the ancient Near East, which was ascribed to Afro-Caribbean religions in order to cast them in a negative light.

And so we come to the lamps. The use of lamps as offerings shows continuity from Graeco-Roman practices as well. Just one notable example came in the Gymnasium area of Corinth (Κόρινθος) where a deposit of some 4000 lamps was found, and so dubbed Κρήνη του Γλαύκου (Fountain of the Lamps). The lamp flame, like the pool of water, is another metaphor for mediation between worlds—the wishes of the devotee are communicated as they ascend from the earthly plane to the celestial one. The Christian votive candle is symbolically identical, and candles and incense are used in the context of prayer worldwide. Furthermore, the lamp, as a magical object, obviously raises echoes from The Book of One Thousand and One Nights tale, Aladdin.

Six lamps in the fountain of Anna Perenna contained rolled up defixiones placed into them as a wick would be. If throwing lamps into a body of water seems self-defeating, this puts it right: Just as a flame sends communication upwards, a heavy piece of metal sends it downwards to the chthonian deities—this is a nega-lamp.

Finally, we have the coins. I was honestly surprised to learn the sacred spring at Aquae Sulis contained 12,000 coins, as the idea of throwing coins into a fountain for luck seems so comparatively modern. Piranomonte reports of the ones at the Fons Annae Perrenae:

[C]oins were found, […] attesting to the practice of throwing money into water as a sign of devotion to the resident nymph(s) or deity.

I wondered if the practice simply came down to “cutting out the middleman”—offering the coin itself as a votive rather than paying a magical practitioner to perform a binding via a defixio. The introduction to Piranomonte’s article reports:

[T]he shift at the nymphaeum away from inscribed text as the effective cursing mode in favour of alternatives seems suggestive in the wider context of the long retreat both from public epigraphic culture (except at the level of the administration) and from personal literacy.

Which is to say the option for individuals to execute their own curse texts was slowly dying out, and even the ability to employ a professional to do so seems also to have dwindled toward the end of the site’s use. Still, there seemed to be other options, as there were lead sheets only containing images or charakteres—magical writing resembling letterforms.

However, two of the lamps each contained a coin, providing a smoking gun for my theory. Lamps are offered with defixio wicks, lamps are offered with coins, coins are substitute defixiones: QED. (Update: at least at Bath, there may have been an earlier Celtic practice of deposition of coins) So consider the old gods of the netherworld you are contacting the next time you pitch a penny into a wishing well.


Read subsequent articles in the Defixiones series

Part 3: Sympathy for Sauron

Part 4: Bargaining with the Gods

Part 5: Secundina’s Beef

Part 6: More Than Money Can Buy

Part 7: The Punic Curse Trail

Part 8: Hellenism Schmellenism


Read previous articles in the Defixiones series

Part 1: The Curses of Aquae Sulis


Notes

  1. “magic, n., Etymology”, Oxford English Dictionary, 2023.
  2. Marina Piranomonte, “Religion and Magic at Rome: The Fountain of Anna Perenna”, Magical Practice in the Latin West, Papers from the International Conference Held at the University of Zaragoza, 30 Sept.–1 Oct. 2005, Gordon & Simón, eds., 2010. I’ve referenced the work throughout.
  3. Publius Ovidius Naso (Ovid) Fasti, 3 (March), 8 CE.

The Curses of Aquae Sulis

A reexamination of the defixio (Defixiones, Part 1)

While visiting Bath, we went to the Roman ruins there. To be frank, my expectations were not high; at street level, the town center is all gray Palladian orderliness built around an insect-in-amber Gothic abbey. Neither does the museum’s entrance offer much promise, feeling like the sleek modern update of a Victorian hotel lobby. But then you step into a secret garden.

You arrive abruptly on a balcony overlooking the Great Bath. Generally, the largest pool in a Roman bath is the natatio (“swimming pool”), which is typically neither as large as Bath’s nor heated, where this one is fed with water from the hot spring, so it is simply designated the Great Bath. Then, as I described of another in situ archaeological museum, you proceed downward through the strata of history, viewing the excavations of the site, together with displays of the artifacts found there.

There were some elements I had not seen before, showing the intermingling of Roman culture and that of the native Celtic Britons. Being familiar with some of the other materials in no way dimmed my enthusiasm. In fact, they told the story of just how much of their way of life the Romans brought with them even to this distant outpost of their empire, as well as how modern in many ways these people were.

As to this last point in particular, there was a lead ingot which had all the characteristics we associate with such an object; a bricklike shape with trapezoidal sides, a standard weight, a raised edge at the top of the casting to show it was whole. This is similar to what is done with coins—if material was scraped off, this raised area is visibly uneven, allowing such thefts to be detected. And it bears an inscription telling us under whose authority it was cast. Each ingot weighs 155 pounds and reads:¹

IMP[eratoris] HADRIANI AUG[usti]
[property of] Emperor Hadrian Augustus

And on the topic of this metal, and unexpectedly, I learned the collection of defixiones at Bath is actually one of the largest yet found, and definitely one of the largest and most important in the archaeology of Roman Britain.

Defixiones, sometimes called curse tablets, are sheets of lead varying in size, with the smallest around 1×1¾ inches and the largest 4¾×10¼ inches (roughly 2.5×4.4/ 12.1×26.1 cm). These sheets were typically inscribed and sometimes drawn on, then folded or crumpled, sometimes with a lock of hair or other component enclosed within, and sometimes pierced with nails.

The most common place to find them in this state is buried in graves or tombs, which is one reason I would not have expected to see them in the thermae and associated temple at Aquae Sulis—the name for the Roman walled town where modern Bath now stands—which did not contain a necropolis or any other such structure. But, as I learned, wells and pools were another place in which defixiones could be deposited—basically as places proximal to the chthonic powers such bodies of water were thought portals to.

As with many things relating to Mediterranean antiquity, I ran across the defixio researching Gods & Heroes. I implemented them as a consumable item from which a player could cast a variety of debuffs on their enemies.

Before deciding this, I read many books, both from the actual traditions and modern archaeological texts. The second category in particular continues to grow: some 1600 separate items identifiable as defixiones have been discovered so far, and there is a great deal of continuing scholarship on the topic.

Furthermore, the materials I read focused mainly on the corpus of defixiones from the Italian Peninsula during the Republic, while these artifacts appeared across the Greco-Roman World, from Africa to the Rhineland, for the entire millennium between the fifth centuries BCE and CE.

In short, it was a great opportunity to return to the topic.

Looking backwards a bit, the continuity from Greek κατάδεσμοι (katadesmoi) is clear. Plato describes them thus:²

ἐάν τέ τινα ἐχθρὸν πημῆναι ἐθέλῃ, μετὰ σμικρῶν δαπανῶν ὁμοίως δίκαιον ἀδίκῳ βλάψει ἐπαγωγαῖς τισιν καὶ καταδέσμοις, τοὺς θεούς, ὥς φασιν, πείθοντές σφισιν ὑπηρετεῖν.

[I]f a man wishes to harm an enemy, at slight cost he will be enabled to injure just and unjust alike, since they are masters of spells and enchantments that constrain the gods to serve their end.

Matthew Dickie examines the attitudes of Tacitus toward various forms of magic shown in his Annals, finding:³

Tacitus conspicuously does not like foreign cults. Yet his disdain for foreign religious practice significantly does not extend to the cults of the Greeks; they are treated with respect and are not dismissed as externae superstitiones as are Egyptian rites and the religious practices of the Celts, Germans, Jews and Christians.

In fact, many of the earliest Roman defixiones continued to be written in Greek, seemingly as part of the ritual until eventually Latin came to dominate.

Winding the clock back still further, there is a clear mutual influence between Egyptian and Greek magic rituals. Friedhelm Hoffmann notes,⁴

The late Egyptian magical papyri show also signs of contact with Greek magic, which in turn was influenced by Egyptian magic.

So much so papyri, written, as the name implies, on the expensive material imported from Egypt, became all but synonymous with magic spells in Greek culture.

The Egyptians also had a tradition bearing similarities to that of the curse tablet; the execration text. These texts also seem to have worked by analogy, being written on items of clay or stone, sometimes even figures of bound captives, which were destroyed and buried.⁵

Moreover, we find as soon as there is written language, it is used for magical formulae, some apotropaic, but just as often meant to harm others. In Sumerian, one particularly cold curse runs:⁶

Namt’il nikkikkani khena
May life be his illness!

In any case, the Greeks and then the Romans widely adopted these practices. Pliny discusses the magic arts, but devotes a full chapter to “The Origin of the Magic Art”, in which he decries its ubiquity, as well as the frauds its practitioners perform, concluding:⁷

natam primum e medicina nemo dubitabit ac specie salutari inrepsisse velut altiorem sanctioremque medicinam, ita blandissimis desideratissimisque promissis addidisse vires religionis, ad quas maxime etiam nunc caligat humanum genus, atque, ut hoc quoque successerit, miscuisse artes mathematicas, nullo non avido futura de sese sciendi atque ea e caelo verissime peti credente. ita possessis hominum sensibus triplici vinculo in tantum fastigii adolevit, ut hodieque etiam in magna parte gentium praevaleat et in oriente regum regibus imperet.

That it first originated in medicine, no one entertains a doubt; or that, under the plausible guise of promoting health, it insinuated itself among mankind, as a higher and more holy branch of the medical art. Then, in the next place, to promises the most seductive and the most flattering, it has added all the resources of religion, a subject upon which, at the present day, man is still entirely in the dark. Last of all, to complete its universal sway, it has incorporated with itself the astrological art; there being no man who is not desirous to know his future destiny, or who is not ready to believe that this knowledge may with the greatest certainty be obtained, by observing the face of the heavens. The senses of men being thus enthralled by a three-fold bond, the art of magic has attained an influence so mighty, that at the present day even, it holds sway throughout a great part of the world, and rules the kings of kings in the East.

That’s the background and tradition against which the defixio is set—the tradition is so pervasive the power to “bind and loose” given to Saint Peter according to Matthew can only be understood in this context.⁸


Addendum

I had been looking for, but failing to find, a good citation showing Greek magical practices incorporated those of the Near East to a large extent, which I knew to be the case. I finally found one in Gordon and Simón’s Introduction to Magical Practice in the Latin West:

In the late Republic, individuals such as the Pythagorean Nigidius Figulus (pr. 58 BCE), who almost certainly studied abroad, had access to a range of Greek occultic sources, themselves mediating material from Babylonia and Egypt.

It seems to be a well enough known fact it is simply taken for granted.


Read subsequent articles in the Defixiones series

Part 2: Malefic Traditional

Part 3: Sympathy for Sauron

Part 4: Bargaining with the Gods

Part 5: Secundina’s Beef

Part 6: More Than Money Can Buy

Part 7: The Punic Curse Trail

Part 8: Hellenism, Schmellenism

Part 9: The Celtic Undercurrents of Bath


Notes

  1. Roman Inscriptions of Britain (RIB), RIB 2404.14, 117–38 CE.
  2. Πλάτων (Plato), Πολιτεία (Republic), 2.364c, ca. 375 BCE, my emphasis. Paul Shorey’s 1969 translation. Κατάδεσμοι is translated as “enchantments”, while the other term translated here as “spells” is ἐπαγωγαῖς.
  3. Matthew Dickie, “Magic in the Roman Historians”, in Magical Practice in the Latin West, Papers from the International Conference Held at the University of Zaragoza, 30 Sept.–1 Oct. 2005, Richard Gordon & Francisco Marco Simón, eds., 2010. The Publius Cornelius Tacitus work referred to is Ab Excessu divi Augusti Historiarum Libri (“Books of History from the Death of the Divine Augustus”), ?–116 CE, commonly referred to as Annales because of its year-by-year structure.
  4. Friedhelm Hoffmann, “Part I, Antiquity”, The Cambridge History of Magic and Witchcraft in the West: From Antiquity to the Present, David J. Collins, S. J., ed., 2015.
  5. Ibid.
  6. Neo-Sumerian Texts, Urnammu no. 28, ii 13–14., cited in Graham Cunningham, Deliver Me from Evil: Mesopotamian Incantations, 2500-1500 BC, 1997.
  7. Gaius Plinius Secundus (Pliny the Elder), Naturalis Historia (Natural History), 30.1, 77–79 CE. John Bostock’s translation, 1855.
  8. Seon Yong Kim, “Ancient Binding Spells, Amulets and Matt 16.18–19: Revisiting August Dell’s Proposal a Century Later”, New Testament Studies, 2016.
  9. Gordon & Simón, “Introduction”, Gordon & Simón, eds., 2010.